Concepts · Embodiment and Regulation

Allostasis

Living systems do not face the same demands from one moment to the next. Allostasis describes how regulatory activity can adjust to changing conditions and anticipated requirements, allowing viable functioning to be maintained through change.

By Yona Ole Lobulu ·

Concept6 min readFoundationalD3.3

Topic
Embodiment and Regulation
Read first
One piece should be read before this one
Reading time
About 6 minutes of reading
Difficulty
Late reading: this page sits at the far end of the Library, after many other pieces

The question

How do living systems maintain viability by adjusting regulation in anticipation of, and response to, changing demands?

Definition

Allostasis is adaptive regulation through change, in which physiological and behavioural activity is adjusted according to current and anticipated demands in ways that support viability.

The pattern of physiological activity appropriate at rest is not the same as the one required during intense exercise.

As physical demand increases, heart rate rises, ventilation changes, blood flow is redistributed and energy use increases. These changes do not indicate that regulation has failed. They help the organism function under conditions that differ from rest.

Living systems therefore face a regulatory problem: the conditions they must function within are continually changing, and the physiological activity appropriate under one set of demands may be inappropriate under another.

Allostasis provides one influential framework for understanding how regulation adjusts to this changing landscape.

What allostasis means

Allostasis is adaptive regulation through change, in which physiological and behavioural activity is adjusted according to current and anticipated demands in ways that support viability.

Peter Sterling and Joseph Eyer introduced the term in the late twentieth century as part of an attempt to describe regulation in a way that emphasized changing physiological requirements rather than relying exclusively on simple models of fixed values and corrective responses. Later formulations of allostasis placed particular emphasis on anticipation: regulatory activity can change in preparation for demands that have not yet fully arrived.

This idea is often summarized as stability through change, but the phrase requires care.

As established in Homeostasis, homeostatic regulation is already dynamic. Physiological stability can involve continuous change, and regulated variables do not necessarily remain at fixed values. The distinctive emphasis of allostasis is therefore not simply that physiology changes. It is that regulatory activity can itself be adjusted according to changing circumstances and anticipated requirements.

The concept is influential, but its precise boundary with homeostasis remains debated. Researchers differ over whether allostasis identifies a distinct category of regulation or whether some of the same phenomena can be accommodated within sufficiently flexible accounts of homeostasis. That relationship is examined directly in D3.4 — Homeostasis and Allostasis.

Regulation depends on context

Different conditions place different demands on an organism.

Physical activity changes metabolic and cardiovascular requirements. Feeding alters demands associated with digestion and nutrient handling. Environmental conditions affect processes involved in maintaining temperature, fluid balance and other physiological variables. Behaviour can also alter the demands an organism encounters and the resources required to meet them.

Regulation therefore occurs within a context. What counts as an appropriate physiological adjustment depends partly on what the organism is doing and on the conditions in which it is acting.

This extends the principle established in Stability Is Actively Produced. Maintaining functioning does not require every component of a living system to remain unchanged. Changes in physiological activity can be part of how the organism continues to function as its requirements shift.

Allostatic regulation places particular emphasis on this demand sensitivity. Rather than treating one physiological configuration as appropriate under every circumstance, it describes regulatory activity as capable of changing with the conditions the organism must meet.

Regulation can prepare for what comes next

Demand-sensitive regulation need not begin only after the full consequences of a demand have occurred.

Feeding provides a useful example. Sensory and learned cues associated with food can trigger physiological responses before absorbed nutrients have produced their full metabolic effects. These cephalic-phase responses include preparatory changes in digestive and metabolic activity associated with incoming food.

The empirical phenomenon is important in its own right: physiological preparation can begin before the full demand arrives. The allostatic framework interprets this kind of anticipatory adjustment as part of adaptive regulation.

In its simplest form:

information relevant to likely demand → physiological adjustment before the demand is fully realized

This does not establish that every anticipatory physiological response must be classified as allostatic. It establishes the more fundamental point that information available in the present can contribute to regulatory changes related to likely future requirements.

Anticipation does not require conscious foresight

Anticipatory regulation does not require an organism to consciously imagine what will happen next.

Sensory information, learned associations and recurring features of the environment can provide information relevant to likely future conditions. Physiological activity can therefore change in advance of a demand without deliberate prediction or conscious expectation.

Some formulations of allostasis describe this as predictive regulation. Here, prediction refers to the functional use of information about likely demands, not to a commitment to any particular theory of cognition or neural computation.

This distinction separates two levels of explanation. Anticipatory physiological adjustment is an observable phenomenon. The allostatic framework is one theoretical way of understanding such adjustment as part of demand-sensitive regulation.

Adaptive does not mean optimal

Describing allostatic regulation as adaptive does not mean that every regulatory adjustment is beneficial under every condition or timescale.

Adaptive, in this context, means that regulatory activity is adjusted in relation to demands. Such adjustments can involve trade-offs, and a response that supports functioning under one set of conditions need not remain appropriate under another.

This distinction also separates allostasis from allostatic load.

Allostasis refers to regulatory adjustment. Allostatic load is a downstream framework concerned with cumulative consequences associated with repeated or sustained regulatory demands. Ordinary allostatic regulation does not, by itself, imply that pathological load is accumulating.

Those longer-term consequences are examined in D3.9 — Cumulative Stress and Allostatic Load.

Allostasis is not stress

Allostasis became especially influential in research on stress and adaptation, but the concepts are not synonymous.

Stress responses can involve allostatic regulation because physiological activity changes in relation to demands placed on the organism. Allostasis is broader: demand-sensitive regulation also occurs outside what would ordinarily be described as stress.

Nor is allostasis a particular hormone, pathway or physiological subsystem. Allostatic regulation can emerge through interacting physiological processes and through behavioural adjustments that alter the organism's relation to its environment.

The physiology of stress and its relationship to changing demands is developed separately in D3.8 — The Stress Response.

What allostasis establishes

Allostasis provides a framework for understanding how regulation can adjust as the demands placed on an organism change. Its particular contribution is to foreground context-sensitive and anticipatory regulation: physiological activity can be altered according to current requirements and information relevant to what may be required next.

This does not establish that allostasis replaces homeostasis, that every anticipatory process is uniquely allostatic or that the boundary between the concepts is scientifically settled. Those questions belong to D3.4 — Homeostasis and Allostasis.

The distinction between allostasis and its cumulative consequences is developed in D3.9 — Cumulative Stress and Allostatic Load, while D3.8 — The Stress Response and D3.10 — Fatigue Regulates Action but Has No Single Cause examine downstream problems for which demand-sensitive regulation provides part of the conceptual foundation.

Homeostasis established that physiological stability is actively regulated. D3.3 adds that the regulation producing viable functioning can itself be adjusted according to current and anticipated demands.

Maintaining viability can involve changing regulation itself.

Sources and research record5 sources, with findings, strengths and limitations as entered

References

5 sources this piece rests on, as entered in the Library.

  1. Sterling, P., Eyer, J. (1988) Allostasis: A New Paradigm to Explain Arousal Pathology

    Theoretical chapter · Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health · 629–649

    Foundational source introducing the allostasis framework as a response to perceived limits in prevailing homeostatic formulations.

  2. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

    Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

    Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

    doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  3. McEwen, B. S. (1998) Stress, Adaptation, and Disease: Allostasis and Allostatic Load

    Review · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1) · 33–44

    Important for adaptation, stress-related applications and the distinction between allostasis and allostatic load.

    doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

  4. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

    Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

    Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

    doi:10.1037/a0035942

  5. Teff, K. L. (2011) How Neural Mediation of Anticipatory and Compensatory Insulin Release Helps Us Tolerate Food

    Review · Physiology & Behavior, 103(1) · 44–50

    Supports the empirical existence of anticipatory physiological regulation independently of how the phenomenon is classified.

    doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.012

Further reading

Behind this page

The claims this concept makes, the evidence behind them, and the limits it accepts.

Evidence status

High confidence

Strongly supported, though resting on synthesis or principle rather than a single decisive body of evidence.

Claims

  1. Physiological requirements and patterns of activity change across contexts

    Established

    What this does not assert: Rest and physical demand call for different regulatory configurations.

    1. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  2. Behavioural adjustments can participate in organism-level allostatic regulation

    High confidence

    What this does not assert: Regulation is not confined to internal physiological pathways.

    1. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  3. Changing regulatory reference conditions can form part of allostatic regulation

    High confidence

    What this does not assert: What counts as appropriate can shift with circumstance.

    1. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  4. Allostatic regulation provides a useful framework for interpreting anticipatory physiological adjustment

    High confidence

    What this does not assert: Interpretive usefulness is not the same as exclusive explanatory ownership.

    1. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  5. Whether allostasis constitutes a fundamentally distinct regulatory category from homeostasis

    Open question

    What this does not assert: Recorded by the Library as unresolved rather than settled.

    1. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

      Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

      Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

      doi:10.1037/a0035942

  6. Whether anticipatory regulation is uniquely allostatic

    Open question

    What this does not assert: Anticipation may not by itself mark the conceptual boundary.

    1. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

      Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

      Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

      doi:10.1037/a0035942

  7. Whether sufficiently sophisticated accounts of homeostasis already accommodate many phenomena attributed to allostasis

    Open question

    What this does not assert: A live theoretical dispute in the physiological literature.

    1. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

      Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

      Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

      doi:10.1037/a0035942

  8. Whether allostasis should be considered a superior general model of physiological regulation

    Open question

    What this does not assert: The Library records the disagreement rather than adjudicating it.

    1. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

      Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

      Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

      doi:10.1037/a0035942

  9. Where the precise scientific boundary between homeostasis and allostasis should be drawn

    Open question

    What this does not assert: Examined, but not resolved, in the dedicated comparison node.

    1. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

      Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

      Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

      doi:10.1037/a0035942

  10. Anticipatory physiological responses can occur before the full consequences of a demand are realized

    Established

    What this does not assert: The phenomenon is observable independently of how it is theoretically classified.

    1. Teff, K. L. (2011) How Neural Mediation of Anticipatory and Compensatory Insulin Release Helps Us Tolerate Food

      Review · Physiology & Behavior, 103(1) · 44–50

      Supports the empirical existence of anticipatory physiological regulation independently of how the phenomenon is classified.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.012

    2. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  11. Cephalic-phase responses provide an empirical example of anticipatory physiological preparation

    Established

    What this does not assert: Cues associated with food precede the metabolic effects of absorbed nutrients.

    1. Teff, K. L. (2011) How Neural Mediation of Anticipatory and Compensatory Insulin Release Helps Us Tolerate Food

      Review · Physiology & Behavior, 103(1) · 44–50

      Supports the empirical existence of anticipatory physiological regulation independently of how the phenomenon is classified.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.012

  12. Anticipatory physiological regulation does not require conscious foresight

    Established

    What this does not assert: Learned associations and recurring environmental features suffice.

    1. Teff, K. L. (2011) How Neural Mediation of Anticipatory and Compensatory Insulin Release Helps Us Tolerate Food

      Review · Physiology & Behavior, 103(1) · 44–50

      Supports the empirical existence of anticipatory physiological regulation independently of how the phenomenon is classified.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.012

  13. Allostasis and allostatic load are conceptually distinct

    Established

    What this does not assert: One names regulatory adjustment; the other names its cumulative consequences.

    1. McEwen, B. S. (1998) Stress, Adaptation, and Disease: Allostasis and Allostatic Load

      Review · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1) · 33–44

      Important for adaptation, stress-related applications and the distinction between allostasis and allostatic load.

      doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

  14. Allostasis is not synonymous with stress

    Established

    What this does not assert: Demand-sensitive regulation also occurs outside anything described as stress.

    1. McEwen, B. S. (1998) Stress, Adaptation, and Disease: Allostasis and Allostatic Load

      Review · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1) · 33–44

      Important for adaptation, stress-related applications and the distinction between allostasis and allostatic load.

      doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

    2. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  15. Ordinary adaptive regulatory activity is not inherently pathological

    Established

    What this does not assert: Adjustment does not by itself imply accumulating load.

    1. McEwen, B. S. (1998) Stress, Adaptation, and Disease: Allostasis and Allostatic Load

      Review · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1) · 33–44

      Important for adaptation, stress-related applications and the distinction between allostasis and allostatic load.

      doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

  16. Allostasis can be understood as adaptive regulation according to current and anticipated demands

    High confidence

    What this does not assert: A theoretical framework rather than a single measurable mechanism.

    1. Sterling, P., Eyer, J. (1988) Allostasis: A New Paradigm to Explain Arousal Pathology

      Theoretical chapter · Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health · 629–649

      Foundational source introducing the allostasis framework as a response to perceived limits in prevailing homeostatic formulations.

    2. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

      Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

      Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

      doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  17. “Stability through change” captures an important emphasis of influential allostasis formulations

    High confidence

    What this does not assert: The phrase requires qualification: homeostatic regulation is already dynamic.

    1. Sterling, P., Eyer, J. (1988) Allostasis: A New Paradigm to Explain Arousal Pathology

      Theoretical chapter · Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health · 629–649

      Foundational source introducing the allostasis framework as a response to perceived limits in prevailing homeostatic formulations.

Sources

  1. Sterling, P., Eyer, J. (1988) Allostasis: A New Paradigm to Explain Arousal Pathology

    Theoretical chapter · Handbook of Life Stress, Cognition and Health · 629–649

    Foundational source introducing the allostasis framework as a response to perceived limits in prevailing homeostatic formulations.

  2. Sterling, P. (2012) Allostasis: A model of predictive regulation

    Theoretical review · Physiology & Behavior, 106(1) · 5–15

    Describes regulation as a whole-organism achievement in which neural, endocrine, metabolic and behavioural processes are coordinated in anticipation of demand rather than governed by any single controller.

    doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.06.004

  3. McEwen, B. S. (1998) Stress, Adaptation, and Disease: Allostasis and Allostatic Load

    Review · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 840(1) · 33–44

    Important for adaptation, stress-related applications and the distinction between allostasis and allostatic load.

    doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09546.x

  4. Ramsay, D. S., Woods, S. C. (2014) Clarifying the Roles of Homeostasis and Allostasis in Physiological Regulation

    Theoretical review · Psychological Review, 121(2) · 225–247

    Key adversarial source examining conceptual ambiguity, overlap and differing interpretations of the homeostasis/allostasis relationship.

    doi:10.1037/a0035942

  5. Teff, K. L. (2011) How Neural Mediation of Anticipatory and Compensatory Insulin Release Helps Us Tolerate Food

    Review · Physiology & Behavior, 103(1) · 44–50

    Supports the empirical existence of anticipatory physiological regulation independently of how the phenomenon is classified.

    doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.01.012

Where to go from here

Next published piece

Homeostasis and Allostasis

Homeostasis and allostasis are often presented as opposing models of biological regulation: one reactive and fixed, the other predictive and flexible. The scientific literature supports a more careful relationship. Both describe dynamic regulation, their explanatory domains overlap, and the precise boundary between them remains theoretically contested.

Continue through the Library →See where this sits in the graph →

Back to the Library →